Wednesday, October 6, 2010

LOST IN TRANSLATION: emilie simon en australie

Arriving a tardy 40 minutes late (at 8:10pm, gosh golly, my oh my) to a gig after meandering through an unfamiliar Brisbane park to the Powerhouse, we were surprised to be greeted by an usher. The usher was to show us to our seats in between songs; it was all very rock and roll.


Attending Emilie Simon’s Brisbane gig was one weird musical experience. It was very much the opposite experience to seeing the long grey strands of what remains of Neil Young’s hair follow him around the main stage at The Big Day Out ’09. That day his old school, perhaps excessively extended, intros and outros to songs seemed to be underappreciated by the crowd of 18 – 25 year olds even if everyone felt privileged to see him.


For those of you who don’t know, Emilie Simon’s music probably fits in somewhere between Radiohead’s Kid A and The Presets’ Beams, at least in its electronic influence. And given that her on stage costume looked like something out of Final Fantasy, it was a surprise that most of the audience appeared too old to appreciate her haunting cover of Come As You Are... not that she played it (much to my disappointment.)


The only reason I can think of to explain the average age of the crowd is that in Australia, Simon’s music is probably best known through the So Frenchy So Chic which is advertised by the ABC/SBS. Although her single, Fleur De Saison, did get some airplay on Triple J a few years back.


The muted atmosphere and short set were probably unfortunate side effects of the demographic although, given the seating arrangements, the organisers seemed to know what they were in for. There were some positives though; a clear view from a comfortable seat and excellent sound quality. However I can’t help but think how good it could have been... maybe I’ll just have to go to France to see her.


Skip to the end: Shock! Horror! Australian people don't get French music.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

The Chicken or the Eagle

It seems to me that, like other Australian institutions, Monash University is a bit confused about what it is that they actually do. In an engineering class we learned that the key to the Wright brothers' ground breaking aviation design, was to realise that a bird’s wing does two completely different tasks. One is provide thrust, and the other is two provide lift. By separating these functions in their design, by having a propeller and a wing, they were able to achieve flight.



Universities do two completely different things as well. One is to impart a sufficient amount of knowledge and know how to students so that they can become professionals in their given field. In this sense some people think of them as ‘degree factories.’ The other objective is to complete research and learn cool new stuff, which people generally believe, will enhance humanity.


Now, why is it that the people who do the research, are also the teachers? Has no one else thought it odd that they effectively have two jobs? Furthermore, it is obvious that most people are either going to be good at one or the other. From a student’s perspective, I don’t care what my lecturer is researching, although I have a rather large vested interest in them being able to teach me something. Strangely, universities (like mine) seem to be fixated on completing ground breaking research to attract more students via their reputation rather than worrying about the quality of teaching that their courses provide.


So what comes first? The teaching or the research? They are obviously both important although if everyone could just learn things straight out of books then the ‘teaching’ would be pointless.


For me, this is only one of many questions universities have to ask themselves if they are to have a clear direction and purpose. For example, are they supposed to make money in their own right or should their graduates be helping the economy enough so that governments can fund them? Are they supposed to be teaching students the relevant knowledge they need to perform a job or are they just sorting them via a series of assessments to help companies choose who to employ? And the big one, what in particular should they be researching? In a place where you can learn almost anything, where people research almost anything, it is no surprise that you constantly hear of funding disputes when there is no common direction for the university as a whole, well, aside from worrying about what other people think.


Skip to the end: A bit of a rant about how lecturer's should be teachers and researchers should be researchers.

Decomposing Kevin

What with the first match played in Melbourne’s new football stadium being in his name, talk is bound to turn to the future of Kevin Muscat and how slow his legs have to get before his quick thinking can no longer compensate (or should that be overcompensate?) Even though next season has the lure of playing in derby matches, and the Asian Champions League again, he is going to have to retire eventually. As seen earlier last season, his absence is clearly a missing link in the chain that is the Victory.

A major part of Ernie’s [Merrick, the manager] game plan is to be able to counter attack quickly, generally with balls to the feet. For this to work well, the defence has to be very good at reading the play. This means that they can intercept an opposition attack and have the vision to start there own, all within a short space of time. Rodrigo and the Princess [Vargas and Leijer, the other central defenders] are alright at this although big Kev has had over a decade of experience at doing it, generally with a lot less time on the ball, and it shows.

The other main thing that Muscat brings to the (shoddy) table is his ability to infect other players with self belief and, possibly more importantly, his knack of riling the opposition and putting them off their game. The latter characteristic is seen by many as a fault, and I must admit I’m at odds with it at times, but the difference between Muscat and a true maniac is that he leaves it on the pitch... well, mostly. Like a race driver, sometimes his single mindedness pays off and he’ll look like a genius, and sometimes it won’t and he’ll appear to have a few screws loose.

Worryingly from a leadership perspective, there are really only two other players in the team with significant experience in Europe, and even then it wasn’t necessarily at a higher level. Archie [Thompson] and Brebner are good players but neither seems like captain material and Archie obviously can’t play balls to himself, try as he might.

On top of this Ernie and his mates are going to have a tough time finding a replacement because it is hard to imagine the future captain being a non-Australian unless they have the reputation of a deity... or they frequent all night functions.

Given that you would no doubt want around half a decade left in the tank of this new recruit to go with the experience, the age bracket is quite tight; late 20’s to early 30’s at a stretch.

So who does this leave as a potential new back seat driver? To my mind, there are two main candidates; Patrick Kisnorbo and Vincenzo Grella. Signing either of them for next season appears extremely unlikely, although you would hope that they are the type of player that is at least being sounded out for a return in a couple of seasons time. At least both of them are from Melbourne and Merrick has coached Grella before (although using that logic we might be able to sign Kennedy and Bresciano as well... errrr, yeah, it could happen.)

The other possibility is to hand Leijer the armband and wait until it fits him properly after a couple of trips round the sun. This wouldn’t be the worst idea as he already has a strong affiliation with the club and has many years ahead of him. If this happened I still reckon the Victory should be looking for an internationally experienced defender or defensive mid to add some balance to the squad.

If they weren’t earmarked as being captain they wouldn’t have to be such a long term solution either. Who knows? Maybe older players with a world of experience such as Edgar Davids and Samual Kuffour might be interested in starting a new and would add a well known name to the big V team sheet. Even players like Aaron Mokoena or Celestine Babayaro might do wonders for our defence with their worldly powers.

However such speculation is fanciful as they may have the same amount of interest in joining a team fashioned by Muscat as Christophe Dugarry would. But the point is that it’s the added experience that we need.

For now though, Kevin’s experience will have to do... even if he turns into a Zimmer wielding elder.

Skip to the end: A blog about Melbourne Victory captain Kevin Muscat. It may not make any sense at all to non fans, so, errr, sssssssssssssorrry about that.

Monday, May 3, 2010

The Opposite of Bubbles

Image: A giant antibubble (from antibubble.com)

Most people associate bubbles with being shiny spheres of infantile joy that float off on an autumn breeze. Either that or having to do the dishes. If only they could see beneath the surface when filling the sink maybe they would notice that there exists bubbles of a different nature, a different disposition. There exists a type of bubble enshrouded by a dark ring, a type of bubble that can sink.

Antibubbles, as the name suggests, are the opposite of common, garden variety bubbles. So instead of having gas inside them they are actually filled with liquid. However they do rely on gas to form their shell. Somewhat ironically, this is what the water inside floats on. The last feature of antibubbles is that the medium they pass through is liquid and not gas. Essentially they are a shell of gas with liquid on the inside and liquid on the outside. As such, when viewing antibubbles they appear to have a dark ring around the outside due to total internal reflection (1).

Image: Ordinary garden variety bubble

Over the past decade a group of scientists from Université de Liège have published several papers with theories explaining several interesting observations made. According to one of their papers, “this unusual object was first reported by Hughes and Hughes” in 1932 (2).

One of the researchers, Stéphane Dorbolo explains, “The antibubble is fascinating because it is not a (sic) stable object as "normal" bubble can be. Moreover it is a very smart manner to separate two miscible liquids using only air. I do think that there is still much (sic) things to discover about this beautiful and so easy to do (sic) object.”

Despite being somewhat intriguing, very little research has been done into the mechanics of antibubbles (1). This is probably a result of their discrete public profile and hitherto lack of practical application.

“The first time I have heard about antibubble is through a colleague who found it on internet. After that, we notice that no serious works have been performed about these particular object (except a Nature paper in 1934),” elaborates Mr. Dorbolo.

Image: creating antibubbles with a beaker (2)

So how are these instable creatures formed? It is not precisely know what combinations of fluids and gases are eligible but a common way to make them involves water with a little bit of detergent (which from now on shall be referred to as just water) as the liquid and air as the gas in the shell. The process itself is very simple yet due to the relatively unstable nature of antibubbles it is highly dependant on certain environmental conditions. The basic method is to simply pour water into a body of water, it is that simple! The catch is that for the antibubbles to form the water has to have the right amount detergent in it, it has to be poured at the right height and at the right rate. Furthermore it apparently helps if the body of water has a ‘clean’ surface and any voltage differential between the body of water and the water being poured should be avoided (2). The reason for this will be discussed later.

Image: Antibubbles forming underwater. Notice the wire connecting the body water to the bubble water (1).

Whilst intact, antibubbles will rise slowly in similar water due to the buoyancy of the air shell. However, if the water used in the bubble is made slightly denser (by adding salt for example) than the body water, then bubbles can be made to more or less ‘float’ in the water or even sink. Floating or hovering antibubbles are interesting because, since they go with the flow of the fluid around them and have no other forces acting on them, they can be used as a rough visualisation of the strain of a fluid element in a flow. In the photos across, antibubbles are observed interacting with a whirlpool in two different ways. Depending on where the antibubble is formed it may either form a horizontal coil following the whirl (b & c) or become vertically elongated in the eye of the whirl (d) (3). Given antibubbles are naturally spheres, and unstable ones at that, it is interesting that they can form these shapes.

Image: Antibubbles interacting with a whirlpool (3).

When sinking however, it has been shown that antibubbles will quickly meet their demise (2). Irrespective of their size or the velocity at which they are falling, antibubbles will reach a critical depth where a combination of the hydrostatic pressure acting on the bubble and the atmospheric pressure at the surface will cause the shell to rupture. The result of this can be seen in the figure below. The small air bubble that was the shell rises to the surface whilst the bubble water mixes with the body water and forms a couple of vortices (1).

This is similar to the way a normal bubble would burst. Notice that the strength of the shell is compromised by air being pushed to the top where the pressure is less. As such, antibubbles will always self destruct from the bottom. Unlike normal bubbles, the shell of an antibubble is quite compressible and once it is thin enough the tails of the surfactants in the water get close enough for Van Der Waals attraction force to become significant and then the whole structure collapses.

Image: Antibubbles popping due to hyrdostatic pressure (1).

Since this drainage of air also happens over time regardless of depth, it limits the lifespan of all antibubbles (4). An antibubble spontaneously popping due to age is shown below.

Image: An antibubble bursting due to aging (4).

However, there are many other factors that can burst your bubble before it gets too old. As mentioned previously, antibubbles are susceptible to potential voltage since it results in the air shell becoming unstable. This is because it acts like a capacitor with concentric electrodes (1).

Another, more obvious way to pop a bubble is with a pin. The figure above right shows how the shell is forced away from the point of rupture (like when a water balloon bursts) whilst the water inside goes in the opposite direction, back towards the pin (1). This results in vortices similar to the result of a depth related pressure failure.

Image: An antibubble that was resting just under the surface being popped with a pin (1).

So what’s the point of all this? Like a lot of scientific investigation, there isn’t one yet although it does represent a new way of mixing liquids so it could have an application with drugs for example. Another example of where knowledge of antibubbles may be applied is in calculating void fractions. A void fraction represents the amount of air in water, and since antibubbles are filled with water, anyone visually calculating a void fraction needs to make sure they aren’t counting antibubbles as bubbles.

On the web –
www.antibubble.org
www.antibubble.com
www.youtube.com/stephanedorbo

Note: For better quality images see original sources.

Reference:
1. S Dorbolo, H Caps & N Vandewalle. Fluid instabilities in the birth and death of anitbubbles. New Journal of Physics 5 (2003) 161.1–161.9
2. S Dorbolo & N Vandewalle. Antibubbles: evidences of a critical pressure. www. arXiv.org. 2003.
3. S Dorbolo, H Caps, N Vandewalle, G Delon & D Terwagne. Antibubbles in a cyclone eyewall. www.arXiv.org. 2009.
4. S Dorbolo, N Vandewalle, E Reyssat & D Quéré. Aging of an antibubble. Europhys. Lett. 69 (2005) 966

Skip to the end: A brief investigation into antibubble research.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

The Dangers of a Walk in the Park

Two words. A mixture of seven vowels and eight consonants, a mixture most people would rather not think about. Bloody diarrhoea. While there is a small amount of glamour in hardship, none of it is conveyed by those two words. Perched on a relatively comfortable toilet seat in Melbourne’s inner east, I realise that maybe this is as close as I’ll get to the experience of almost 70,000 people who fought in Papua New Guinea in World War II – despite having just completed the 96km walk across the Owen Stanley ranges, where much of the fighting took place, known as the Kokoda track.

As a legacy of tales from the war, the track has the reputation of being extremely difficult. Unfortunately, in recent times its notoriety has been augmented by several deaths. On the 17th of April last year Samantha Killen, a 36 year old Victorian woman, reportedly died from either dehydration or asthma only days into the walk. Less than a week later on the 22nd of April, Chris Frost, a 26 year old New South Welshman, died from a suspected heat related illness. Then on the 11th of August, thirteen people died when a plane, that was chartered to fly to the Kokoda end of the walk, crashed into the side of a mountain in bad conditions.

According to No Roads Expeditions General Manager, Doug Dent, “April is the busiest time of year to do the trek, especially around ANZAC day.”

So should the many walkers currently over in PNG be worried for their safety? And what makes the track dangerous?

Mr. Dent, who completed the track at the age of 65, claims “we don’t actually have many people sustain an injury.”

Image: Michael and Linasa crossing one of the many rivers.

However, in order to get a first hand perspective of the potential dangers, I walked the track from late September to early October last year along with three other walkers paying to be there, and four No Roads guides who were paid to be there.

As you would expect, most people walk the track with friends or family. I went with an old school friend, Dean Baker. Turning 23 the day before we start walking, Dean is a fifth year Science/Engineering student from Melbourne. He is generally fit although his coeliac disease could cause him problems trekking; he can’t eat gluten or he won’t be able to process food for up to a week, resulting in diarrhoea and lethargy.

When we booked our trip we knew there could be up to 20 people in our group. Whilst this isn’t as many trekkers as allowed by some other companies, we both felt it was more than ideal. So we were both relieved to find out that there were only two others in our group, as were they – our first slice of luck.

It was explained to us by the No Roads representative, who met us upon arrival at Jacksons International Airport, that other people had paid deposits for our trek. However, they pulled out due to feeling under prepared after reappraising the dangers of the walk.

Meeting Damien O’Neill and Michael Lewis at the airport in Port Moresby turned out to be rather appropriate. Damien, 39, and Michael, 42, are both flight attendants from Brisbane. They both appear to be fit for their age. Whilst Damien is medium height and stocky build, Michael is slightly taller and a bit thinner.

Waiting to leave the hotel to go have dinner, we browse the day’s newspaper. Whilst the front page story details how around 60 people broke out of the local prison, the page three news is of more concern; “Australian dies walking Kokoda Track for charity.”

Later at dinner, Michael receives a text message from his wife alerting him to yesterday’s tragedy. Paul Bradfield, 38, died in his sleep on his wife’s birthday. He was walking the track to raise money for Camp Quality, who had helped his family whilst his youngest daughter was battling leukaemia.

Worryingly there were reportedly no signs of him having any difficulties during the day. He just woke up in the middle of the night and couldn’t breathe.

I nervously ate as much of my food as I could.

It turned out we had all received much the same instructions from loved ones: don’t die.

In light of the news, we discuss why we are all doing the trek. Damien says he’s doing it “mainly for the challenge.” This seems to be the same reason we are all doing it as none of us have any direct link to those who fought.

“If you don’t do things then you just end up sitting at home,” adds Dean.

The next day we actually start walking and I start to feel much more relaxed.

Simon Euki, 28, is the leader of our group. Like the other three guides he grew up in the hillside village of Kagi, halfway along the track, although now lives in Port Moresby.

I am encouraged by the sight of his build. Admittedly he is a fair bit more muscular than me, but he is still quite light and skinny.

Walking up the first hill, an ascent of more than 400m in altitude, I follow in the footsteps of 24 year old Linasa Ben, our pacesetter. He later explains to me that he weighs around 55kg and up to 58kg when he gets “fat.”

At the top of the hill there’s a slight wait of a minute or so for Damien. He weighs around 100kg and I soon realise that if I were carrying an extra 35kg everyone would be waiting a lot longer.

Image: Going up hill on day 2.

Michael explains, “If there’s one thing about Damien, it’s that he’s determined. No matter how slow he has to go, he’ll get there.”

Both Dean and Michael end up weighing 80kg, although before the walk they weighed 82kg and 86kg respectively.

Along with my weight advantage, my training has held me in good stead. Climbing 64 stories of stairs, once or twice a week, in tropical Malaysia has prepared me well.

“People tend to become dehydrated in the first couple of days because they’re still acclimatising to the humidity,” Mr. Dent explains to me later.

He also tells me that dehydration is a problem because it can lead to loss of concentration, which can in turn lead to sprained ankles and the like.

Despite this, “some people get on the booze the night before walking,” he says.

Not of his own doing, Dean’s preparations were hampered by falling off his bike, resulting in four stitches in his knee. This was only four weeks before the walk.

Michael’s preparations were hampered by a back problem.

“Six weeks ago I couldn’t walk.”

He explained that after doing a few too many sit ups, he woke up the next day with his spine visibly out of place and had to go to the doctors. So getting to the end of the first day in good shape was quite a relief.

The guides, by contrast, walk the track roughly once every two weeks. “If I were walking by myself it would take me three days,” says Linasa. It is taking us seven.

At the first campsite we meet another No Roads group going the other way. Their Australian guide, Richard Godden, reinforces to us the dangers of our already remote location. “If you need CPR you’re gone for. By the time we call the insurance agency and find an available helicopter, if the weather’s not great it could be 48 hours before they get to you.”

Day 2 was the hardest day of the walk, or so we had been told. Over 1300m of ascent, divided into two sections of gruelling uphill.

On that day that Dean got seriously bad cramps in both his legs. “I couldn’t bend my knees so I had to kick a root each step to get them to unlock.”

On top of that, we had pizza for dinner that night which he couldn’t eat. Fortunately he could eat some of the rice that the guides were eating.

Kila Dannis, 20, and Tobias Beliki, 22, were the other two guides. They did a lot of the cooking. Often they would go ahead of us to prepare lunch for when we arrived. In that sense it was the quite a luxurious hike.

Both of them wore only one shoe for most of the hike, not even a boot. Kila explained that he had a blister and he found it more comfortable not wearing his dilapidated shoe.

In some way this made me feel better about my own blisters which had been forming on the outsides of my toes.

Image: One of my blisters at the end of the walk.

Due to their jobs, our guides don’t get to spend that much time in their home village of Kagi. So we spend most of day 4 at the village, much to the relief of my feet.

This day exemplified the other reason people do Kokoda, perhaps the most import one of all. It’s fun.

Keeping a bunch of local kids entertained was quite a cultural experience as well as fun; playing cricket with energy we didn’t know we had, watching them climb on the roof to get the ball, making paper planes that couldn’t hack the tropical rain, watching them make planes out of leaves using razor blades.

As with any hike there was a lot of joke telling and innuendo to help get us through the day and enjoy ourselves.

“I’m forcing it in now because I know I’ll want it in an hour,” Dean said over breakfast. I couldn’t help but smirk.


Image: My right eye swelled up over night in Kagi.

By day 5 any sense of fear or being daunted had gone. We had reached the highest point, 2190m above sea level; it was all down hill from there. That afternoon we slid down the steep hills with almost reckless abandon in the downpour. The combination of fatigue and relief made it hard not to laugh at every slip.

Not everything was a laughing matter though as slip ups can prove costly. On the night of day 6, Michael got bad dysentery. At the end of the day’s walking, he just wanted to have a shower. In a minor lapse, he got some of the water in his mouth, just a few drops was enough.

It was painful watching him struggle through the final day.

When we finally got to Kokoda on day 7, Linasa ended the walk with his customary “packs off.” Those two words were always accompanied by an element of relief, but none greater than that day. This feeling of accomplishment had to be the reason thousands of people do the walk each year.

Ironically, the town of Kokoda seems more dangerous than the rest of the walk. There are shops there and all of the stock is kept behind bars, behind the counter as is customary in Papua New Guinea. When we’re going to bed Linasa reminds us to make sure we don’t leave anything outside the guesthouse.

“There are too many primitives,” he says.

Back at the hotel there is a sobering reminder of what we have just been lucky enough to achieve relatively incident free. The headline of the day’s paper is “Kokoda death.” Phillip Brunskill, a 55 year old New South Welshman, died from a suspected heart attack the day we finished walking.

During the war over 15,000 people died in the area. According to plaques placed as memorials, the “incidence of sickness [was] three times that of battle casualties.”


Image: One of the plaques at the memorial in Port Moresby.

It was in order to avoid sickness that I was taking my malaria tablet on my last night in Port Moresby. It was a tired and stupid decision to take it with plain tap water.

Skip to the end: A slightly updated version of my previous article about the potential hazards of the Kokoda track in PNG.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Exchange II: The Adventure Strikes Back

I’m starting to think that expensive things seem attractive
by virtue of knowing that they are expensive. As a part of my marathon 65 hour journey to my new exchange location, INSA Lyon in France, I was forced into spending a night in London. Having already spent over 12 hours of waiting at Heathrow Airport, I couldn’t be bothered finding a hotel so I decided to lash out and stay at the exorbitantly priced Sofitel which was only a short walk away.

Having never actually stayed at an expensive hotel before, I wasn’t really sure what to expect. Sure I’ve wandered through some of the most expensive hotels in south-east Asia (Raffles, The Empire, Traders, Eastern & Oriental) but I assumed staying in one would be completely different. Unfortunately I was incorrect.

Whilst all of the aforementioned establishments have some sort of grandiose aspect to them to help justify spreading your wallets legs wide open for them, an airport hotel doesn’t exactly have the same seductivity levels to me. I don’t understand why anyone (unfortunately including myself) would pay a lot of money to stay there. But that’s not the worst of it.

When I first arrived at LHR I met a lovely Mauritian man on the train. We had a brief conversation and when we were parting ways he pointed out that he was staying at the Sofitel. At the time I thought it was weird, why would I care where he was staying?? I wasn’t exactly about to have intercourse with him. But it has now dawned on me that it is part of what you’re paying for; to be able to tell people that you’re spending a stupid amount of money on something you don’t need to spend the money on (like I’m doing now, I may as well get my money’s worth.) Some people shorten this and just call it a ‘status symbol.’

This wouldn’t bother me so much if you got a lot for paying a lot, but you really don’t. It seems to me that most of the money goes into the fine furnishings and appearances rather than any sort of service. These are the sort of things that you may want if it was your actual home (there was actually a brochure in the room selling most of the room) but you don’t really get to experience their long lasting quality in a one night stand. More alarming than what you get is what you don’t get. Relatively basic luxuries like movies, meals and drinks all cost extra. Bear in mind that these are things you would normally get for ‘free’ when flying cattle class with a non budget airline. Surely it wouldn’t be hard to squeeze these things into what I’m sure is an already slim operating margin.

Anyway, as I mentioned earlier, I am now starting my second exchange at L’Institut National des Sciences Appliquées in Lyon. I am doing this Lyon/KL exchange combo in the opposite order to what my friend Alex did. So far I think she has prepared me well as far as not expecting too much, i.e. everything to be magical here. Because it would be possible to get that idea in your head based on people’s reactions to you telling them you’re going to France. It’s interesting because when you tell people (in Australia) that you’re going to Malaysia, they instinctively ask why you are going there. With la France, par contre, people tend to get a lot more excited for some reason. Anyway, as long as it’s not all about telling people you’re staying there I’ll be happy.

Skip to the end: I'm in France and slightly annoyed at myself for staying at an expensive hotel on the other side of la manche.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Riding the Swing

In an online response to an opinion piece in The Age about the impending Altona by-election, I stumbled across a novel idea; that voting for what you believe in isn’t necessarily the best idea. Now, this may seem like a stupid idea unless you find yourself between a gun and a hard vote, but given that this is (hopefully) not the case in Altona, you would be right in thinking that this is not what I’m talking about.


I’m referring to the idea of voting for a political ‘climate’ rather than any particular person or party per se. The good people of Altona and its surrounding suburbs find themselves residing in a ‘safe’ Labour seat. However, some people such as Randal from Point Cook, are not overly thrilled with the State Government’s performance regarding infrastructure and what have you. I get the impression that Randal is not overly keen on the opposition either and yet, he proposes voting for them. Why? Because, as he points out, if Altona were to become a swinging seat (in the political sense, not the waiting room chair of an unscrupulous establishment sense) both of the major political parties would start paying a lot more attention to it. The competition would spur on efforts by both parties to actually work towards sating the electorate’s hunger for improvement.



If such political competition were to arise in Malaysia, “Malaysia boleh” (literal translation is Malaysia can) could become more of a reality and less of a Russian space trip. As far as I’m aware, Malaysia is as close as it has ever been to an actual two party system pending the outcome of a court case. These are potentially exciting times for Malaysian politics, even for the ruling party. Hopefully, they will rise to the competition by bettering themselves. As such, they could win over more ardent supporters as opposed to voters who see no other option.


Whether or not this competition actually improves the situation is another thing. Obviously competition can lead to instability, like in Ukraine in 2004, and worse still, violent repression, like in Iran last year. Furthermore, competition doesn’t magically render politicians any more competent at what they do. As Sacha Baron Cohen once said to Tomasz Starzewski, “you can’t polish a turd.” For what it’s worth I believe that Malaysia and Altona ‘can,’ but whether they will or not is another thing.


Lastly, if you want to sit down and have a little think about whether you should vote based on morals alone, or vote based on what will benefit you directly, I’d recommend watching a German film called The Edukators.


Skip to the end: For some unknown reason I've started writing about politics when I'm somewhat uneducated in the area. Still, that hasn't stopped me writing about things before.